Skip to content
  • Home
  • Profile
  • Practice Areas
    • Corporate and Commercial
    • Intellectual Property
    • Real Estate, Banking and Finance
    • Dispute Resolution and Debt Recovery
    • Technology, Media and Telecommunications
  • Team
    • Lorna Mbatia
    • Roselyne Muyaga
    • Brenda Vilita
    • Emma Kyalo
    • Billy Wesonga
    • Jedidah Ngina
    • Setian Bundi
    • Patricia Muthoni
    • Monica Murage
    • Julie Atieno
  • Insights
  • Contact us
  • Home
  • Profile
  • Practice Areas
    • Corporate and Commercial
    • Intellectual Property
    • Real Estate, Banking and Finance
    • Dispute Resolution and Debt Recovery
    • Technology, Media and Telecommunications
  • Team
    • Lorna Mbatia
    • Roselyne Muyaga
    • Brenda Vilita
    • Emma Kyalo
    • Billy Wesonga
    • Jedidah Ngina
    • Setian Bundi
    • Patricia Muthoni
    • Monica Murage
    • Julie Atieno
  • Insights
  • Contact us

Insights

FOREIGN OR ARIPO TRADE MARKS NOT PROTECTED IN TANZANIA (MAINLAND): LANDMARK COURT OF APPEAL DECISION.

The Court of Appeal of Tanzania has delivered a landmark decision in Lakairo Industries Group Co. Ltd & Others v. Kenafrica Industries Ltd & Others, Civil Appeal No. 593 of 2022 (26 September 2025), reaffirming that foreign or ARIPO trade mark registrations do not confer enforceable rights in Tanzania without local registration.

This ruling sets a significant precedent in Tanzanian trade mark jurisprudence and underscores the territorial nature of intellectual property rights in the country.

Key highlights of the decision

  1. Protection limited to domestic registration

The Court reaffirmed that under the Trade and Service Marks Act, Cap. 326, exclusive trade mark rights exist only upon registration in Tanzania. In this case, Kenafrica Industries, a Kenyan company, relied on its Kenyan and ARIPO registrations obtained under the Banjul Protocol. While Tanzania is recorded by ARIPO as having acceded to the Banjul Protocol on 1 September 1999, the country follows a dualist legal system and has not ratified or domesticated the Protocol through national legislation. Consequently, the Court held that the Banjul Protocol has no legal force in Tanzania, and ARIPO registrations are not effective or enforceable within the country.

  1. Damages overturned

The Court of Appeal set aside the earlier High Court award of damages amounting to Tzs. 3.97 billion, holding that special damages must be expressly claimed and proven with certainty.

  1. Validity of local marks upheld

The Court found that the Tanzanian company’s registrations (Lakairo) were valid and could not be cancelled based on foreign rights. The appeal succeeded in full, with costs awarded to the appellants.

This decision reinforces that trade mark protection in Tanzania can only be secured through local registration. Although Tanzania is a member of ARIPO, it merely acceded to the Banjul Protocol at the international level and has not ratified or domesticated it under national law. As a result, ARIPO trade marks designating Tanzania have no legal effect within the country. Similarly, Tanzania is not a member of the Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks, meaning it cannot be designated in an international application. Foreign, ARIPO, or Madrid registrations; regardless of prior use, reputation, or seniority; do not automatically extend protection to the Tanzanian market. To obtain enforceable rights, proprietors must file national applications directly with the Business Registrations and Licensing Agency (BRELA).

In light of this development, trade mark owners are encouraged to review their existing portfolios to identify marks that require national registration in Tanzania. Where protection is sought or use is ongoing, it is prudent that proprietors proceed to file or refile trade marks locally to ensure enforceability.

We continue to monitor developments in the region and remains available to advise clients on the most appropriate strategies for protecting and enforcing their trade mark rights in Tanzania and beyond. We will also continue to monitor legislative and policy developments regarding Tanzania’s potential domestic implementation of the Banjul Protocol.

For further assistance or inquiries, please contact us at info@cfllegal.com.

Contributor:

Patricia Muthoni
  • Careers
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy policy
  • Careers
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy policy

Share this page

Contact Information

Nairobi, Kenya

T: +254 20 444 0891/2

E: info@cfllegal.com

 

Physical address:

8th Floor, Sifa Towers,

Lenana Road, Kilimani,

Nairobi.

 

Postal address:

P.O Box 23555-00100,

Nairobi, Kenya

Kigali, Rwanda

T: +250 787 595 925

E: rwanda@cfllegal.com

 

Physical address:

2nd Floor, Ikaze House

KG 11 Av 10, Gisimenti

Kigali

 

Postal address:

P.O. Box 1639,

Kigali, Rwanda

Copyright © 2025 CFL Advocates All Rights Reserved

Join Our Mailing List

Subscribe
Powered by Tytantech

Subscribe to our mail list

Receive updates on new insights posted in real time.

This website uses cookies

We use cookies on our site to personalise content, to provide social media features, to analyse our traffic and to enhance your user experience. By using our site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Read more about it here.

ACCEPT & CLOSE